by Alex Berenson
Moderna just published the full results from its pivotal 40,000-person trial comparing its mRNA flu jab to a standard flu shot.
They are awful. Not that you would know from the legacy media’s coverage, or Moderna’s press release promising “potential approvals expected to begin in 2026.”
The trial showed severe side effects from the mRNA shot dwarfed whatever protection against flu it may offer.
Compared to a standard flu shot, the mRNA jab prevented about 1 hospitalization in every 5,000 people who received it.¹ But compared to the standard shot, the mRNA jab caused severe after-injection side effects such as vomiting or a 102- to 104-degree fever in an extra 1 out of 18 people.
In other words, Moderna’s own data show that about 270 people will suffer severe vaccine side effects from its shot to stop a single flu hospitalization. In what world does that risk ratio make sense?²
The trial also showed that more people who received the mRNA shot died from all causes in the next six months than those who got the standard jab.
Read more from Alex Berenson here: https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/the-moderna-flu-jab-has-a-comically?r=adsuh&triedRedirect=true